Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Runcam Split
#16
(13-Jun-2017, 10:11 AM)Carl.Vegas Wrote: A really good point on the swift... what is acceptable to see in FPV camera isn't always acceptable to see in actioncam footage. 

For me... I am OK with seeing my props in my goggles but it's a total irritation for them to show in my youtube videos... I undetstand that some people might not have as much of an issue with it but for me I really don't like my props being in frame. This might actually be something I'd either need to solve for, or I might not be interested in this camera after all! I am going to have to have a serious thought about it.

I've thought about this too.  Nice thing about the design though, is that you can mount it in any position you want (like higher).  That will take some work on existing frames to provide protection for the cam unit - but I suspect that this thing will become so popular that people will start designing frames around it!  (I'm considering it for a pod design.)
[-] The following 1 user Likes sloscotty's post:
  • PaulMek
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
#17
(13-Jun-2017, 10:22 AM)sloscotty Wrote: I've thought about this too.  Nice thing about the design though, is that you can mount it in any position you want (like higher).  That will take some work on existing frames to provide protection for the cam unit - but I suspect that this thing will become so popular that people will start designing frames around it!  (I'm considering it for a pod design.)

hmmm... good point... it can be mounted in a different location.... 

The only problem is right now I really want to put it in a Pirat Sloop in my next build... :\ I might have to forgo the split for that build just because of this issue.
carl.vegas
Current Quads: Operational: Diatone GT2 200 In need of repair: Bumble Bee, tehStein,  Slightly modified Vortex 250 
Reply
#18
Just to let you know there is some lovely footage here from a really great guy!
Windless fields and smokeless builds
[-] The following 2 users Like Tom BD Bad's post:
  • Oscar, sloscotty
Reply
#19
I'm seeing it more aim at someone like me who isn't racing but wants to have a FPV'esque view from the quad while flying for scenery and still capturing the equivalent of "B roll" while a Gimbal mounted cam does the rest...
Builds: Mini-Quad  -  Tricopter 
A Blog

Reply
#20
(13-Jun-2017, 12:53 PM)Aaron Wrote: I'm seeing  it more aim at someone like me who isn't racing but wants to have a FPV'esque view from the quad while flying for scenery and still capturing the equivalent of "B roll" while a Gimbal mounted cam does the rest...

Funny, I was just thinking with the new 07xx brushless motors available, how long till someone makes a lightweight micro brushless gimbal for a micro HD camera! Not sure those little motors have the space for the amount of winds/poles needed for a smooth gimbal though?
Windless fields and smokeless builds
Reply
#21
Here is another test today Smile
I am quite impressed that I don't have much jello in the footage Smile

Don't be a LOS'er, be an FPV'er :)  My Gear - Facebook - Instagram - Twitter
[-] The following 5 users Like Oscar's post:
  • ZERONEST, Carl.Vegas, Tom BD Bad, guile, sloscotty
Reply
#22
That's fantastic Oscar! Pre-order here I come! Big Grin
Reply
#23
nice, i guess as long as the quad is well tuned there should be no issue with jello in any lighting conditions.

i'm fine with having props and frame in a race quad
Reply
#24
It's difficult to watch both videos at the same time, but when you're showing both the Split and the RC3 side-by-side, there doesn't seem to be much difference in latency between the 2. I expected to see more from the RC2
Reply
#25
Also very impressed with how little jello there is on your build Oscar, I thought that a small piece of inner-tube to make rubber washers for the mount, might help with jello problems?
Windless fields and smokeless builds
Reply
#26
BG just listed the RunCam Split in black here -
https://www.banggood.com/Runcam-Split-Bl...ewArrivals
Windless fields and smokeless builds
[-] The following 1 user Likes Tom BD Bad's post:
  • sloscotty
Reply
#27
(14-Jun-2017, 05:56 AM)Tom BD Bad Wrote: Also very impressed with how little jello there is on your build Oscar, I thought that a small piece of inner-tube to make rubber washers for the mount, might help with jello problems?

Runcam told me that are making a TPU or silicone mount for the camera to prevent jello... but TBH if the quad is tuned right there should be minimal amount of jello Smile
Don't be a LOS'er, be an FPV'er :)  My Gear - Facebook - Instagram - Twitter
[-] The following 1 user Likes Oscar's post:
  • Tom BD Bad
Reply
#28
(14-Jun-2017, 09:13 AM)Oscar Wrote: Runcam told me that are making a TPU or silicone mount for the camera to prevent jello... but TBH if the quad is tuned right there should be minimal amount of jello Smile

As previously demonstrated by a master!

Edit to add : RunCam also got back to me with regards to the possibility of purchasing board and cam separately and they said no.
Windless fields and smokeless builds
[-] The following 1 user Likes Tom BD Bad's post:
  • fftunes
Reply
#29
Great video Oscar, I really like that you included some DVR footage. Gives a good feel for the cam overall!

Unfortunately for me, I think I am out on this product... the in view elements are a deal breaker for me... I'll have to stick with the extra weight and awkward mounts at least for my next build.
carl.vegas
Current Quads: Operational: Diatone GT2 200 In need of repair: Bumble Bee, tehStein,  Slightly modified Vortex 250 
[-] The following 1 user Likes Carl.Vegas's post:
  • Tom BD Bad
Reply
#30
this is going to be perfect for submitting MultiGP UTT videos.
[-] The following 2 users Like JimmyLe813's post:
  • Tom BD Bad, Carl.Vegas
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Help Runcam thumb pro jello retrobatman 3 1,085 09-Aug-2023, 02:04 PM
Last Post: Oscar
  New Product RunCam Thumb Pro Camera (4K) SnowLeopardFPV 36 10,311 07-Jul-2023, 12:14 AM
Last Post: aeterfpv
Question marriage between a runcam split and a runcam2? would that be possible? hugnosed_bat 4 578 22-Mar-2023, 04:34 AM
Last Post: hugnosed_bat
  New Product Runcam 5 Orange Banelle 45 14,275 21-Oct-2022, 12:01 PM
Last Post: Banelle
  Help Runcam thumb installation drone538 1 461 29-Sep-2022, 10:02 AM
Last Post: StSV


Login to remove this ad | Register Here