02-Aug-2016, 07:28 PM (This post was last modified: 17-Oct-2016, 09:33 PM by Oscar.)
Fancy an Inductrix ? Why not build it yourself it's not as light weight and little as the tiny whoop, but it's just as much fun and it's cheaper to build too.
The frame weights 12 to 13g and it's printed with PolyMax filament.
03-Aug-2016, 01:01 AM (This post was last modified: 03-Aug-2016, 01:01 AM by Oscar.)
(02-Aug-2016, 10:46 PM)sloscotty Wrote: That's great Oscar! I love the coathanger gate!!
thanks it was a quick improvise lol what's better and quicker to setup as a micro quad gate? it's actually easier to fly through than it looks.. By the way thanks for naming Whoopee
Oh wow! I must be living under a quad copter rock that filament looks incredibly. To bad they only make it in 1.75mm. The Whoopee looks great too. I'll have to print one up in when I find something comparable to Polymax. Thanks for sharing It
(03-Aug-2016, 01:56 AM)Trollhammered Wrote: Oh wow! I must be living under a quad copter rock that filament looks incredibly. To bad they only make it in 1.75mm. The Whoopee looks great too. I'll have to print one up in when I find something comparable to Polymax. Thanks for sharing It
They do make it in 3mm as well for ultimakers Try ABS if possible PLA might be a bit too brittle but I haven't tried yet..
(03-Aug-2016, 03:47 AM)Oscar Wrote: They do make it in 3mm as well for ultimakers Try ABS if possible PLA might be a bit too brittle but I haven't tried yet..
(03-Aug-2016, 01:01 AM)Oscar Wrote: thanks it was a quick improvise lol what's better and quicker to setup as a micro quad gate? it's actually easier to fly through than it looks..
For you maybe...
Quote:By the way thanks for naming Whoopee
You're welcome! - I'm honored you used the name... But for the way I fly, mine'll be "Whoopsie" for awhile... Gonna try to print one in ABS and see how it goes. Thanks for posting the print files!
Based on personal experience here gents......I have had BG indicated something was in stock and I ordered based on that and it turned out that it was NOT in stock and they knew it........FWIW.
(04-Aug-2016, 02:04 PM)sirdude Wrote: Based on personal experience here gents......I have had BG indicated something was in stock and I ordered based on that and it turned out that it was NOT in stock and they knew it........FWIW.
Seems to be the general principle with BG, pay and pray
QAV210 - LUX FC - LB 20A ESC - Cobra 2205 2300 QAV210 - LUX FC - DYS XS20A ESC - DYS SE2205 2300 Alien 5" - KISS FC - KISS 24A ESC - Lumenier 2206 2350
Guys I need some advice, I'm looking at the FX798T camera right now but stumbled upon this other camera, what is/are the difference(s) with the FX798T? http://www.banggood.com/FX797T-5_8G-25mW...42994.html And I guess this camera will also fit the camera mount?
04-Aug-2016, 06:27 PM (This post was last modified: 04-Aug-2016, 06:29 PM by Sigloss.)
(04-Aug-2016, 06:09 PM)willie013 Wrote: Guys I need some advice, I'm looking at the FX798T camera right now but stumbled upon this other camera, what is/are the difference(s) with the FX798T? http://www.banggood.com/FX797T-5_8G-25mW...42994.html And I guess this camera will also fit the camera mount?
I'm running the FX797T on my Tiny Whoop (Inductrix) using a 3D printed mount designed for the FX798T so should work fine.
I'd love to be able to give you some smart reason why I have that camera and not the FX798T but to be honest I didn't even realize until it arrived
Going purely on the stats, 798 seems to be fixed at 3.7V (where 797 ranges from 2.5 - 5V) only and has a soft antenna stork which I suspect would be better on a Whoop given how often it hits things.
QAV210 - LUX FC - LB 20A ESC - Cobra 2205 2300 QAV210 - LUX FC - DYS XS20A ESC - DYS SE2205 2300 Alien 5" - KISS FC - KISS 24A ESC - Lumenier 2206 2350
(04-Aug-2016, 06:27 PM)Sigloss Wrote: I'm running the FX797T on my Tiny Whoop (Inductrix) using a 3D printed mount designed for the FX798T so should work fine.
I'd love to be able to give you some smart reason why I have that camera and not the FX798T but to be honest I didn't even realize until it arrived
Going purely on the stats, 798 seems to be fixed at 3.7V (where 797 ranges from 2.5 - 5V) only and has a soft antenna stork which I suspect would be better on a Whoop given how often it hits things.
Thanks! I guess I'll just go with the 798 since it has a flexible antenna! Btw, does it matter that the video output is NTSC instead of the usual PAL in europe?