Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My second build
#46
Hi ssaakkaa,

Very Nice Looking Build  Thumbs Up

Yeah, I totally agree that Snow's solution is likely much better especially for durability. For me, the hot glue/shrink tubing method is very light weight and simple to execute and has proven extremely durable for my style of flying {easy cruising and endurance} and my build objectives, one of which is sub 250 grams. I rarely land right side up and occasionally have to ditch the flight from altitude. So, in some respects I have been surprised at how well my antennas have survived.

Anyway, it is just another option. {I like having options}.

High Five
______________________________________
My BUILDS  ||   My INDEX   ||  Parts Guide  <-- Download


[-] The following 1 user Likes iFly4rotors's post:
  • ssaakkaa
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
#47
(13-Feb-2021, 05:02 PM)iFly4rotors Wrote: Hi ssaakkaa,

Very Nice Looking Build  Thumbs Up

Yeah, I totally agree that Snow's solution is likely much better especially for durability. For me, the hot glue/shrink tubing method is very light weight and simple to execute and has proven extremely durable for my style of flying {easy cruising and endurance} and my build objectives, one of which is sub 250 grams. I rarely land right side up and occasionally have to ditch the flight from altitude. So, in some respects I have been surprised at how well my antennas have survived.

Anyway, it is just another option. {I like having options}.

High Five

ofc, more opinions are always better, so I really respect your input Smile 
thank you once again
[-] The following 1 user Likes ssaakkaa's post:
  • iFly4rotors
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Build Helios - 3.5” Sub-250g (Sub 160g possible) DJI O3 Drone – Frame/Build Thread Recursion 13 2,087 14-May-2024, 09:55 AM
Last Post: FloppyFish
  Build Micro Apex 4" Build drumgod 18 969 09-May-2024, 01:33 PM
Last Post: drumgod
  Build Rekon5 UL 5" build ph2t 51 8,248 12-Apr-2024, 02:26 AM
Last Post: ph2t
  Build 5in lightweight build hawk01 37 1,467 22-Mar-2024, 10:56 AM
Last Post: Jossey
  Build Whoosh - 3.5" build. PID settings? maxer 23 1,247 30-Dec-2023, 08:29 PM
Last Post: SnowLeopardFPV


Login to remove this ad | Register Here