Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
roninUAV Ronin Mk1
#61
WOW, I'm a little late to the party, but congratufreakinglations!  Bad ass.  I think your OCD is the secret sauce for future success in this endeavor.   Good luck bro!

Thumbs Up
[-] The following 1 user Likes Green_Weedle's post:
  • the.ronin
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
#62
Well-thought frame design. Nice work man.

Interesting approach for the connected arms and the four only standoffs. However, wouldn't less standoffs affect the durability?
[-] The following 1 user Likes m3sgal's post:
  • the.ronin
Reply
#63
I LOVE IT TAKE MY MONEY NOW PLS and THX
I'm really IntoFPV
Youtube|Instagram|Facebook|Steam
Don't forget to rate people who have helped you!
[-] The following 1 user Likes bffigjam's post:
  • the.ronin
Reply
#64
(27-Apr-2021, 11:25 PM)m3sgal Wrote: Well-thought frame design. Nice work man.

Interesting approach for the connected arms and the four only standoffs. However, wouldn't less standoffs affect the durability?

Absolutely. My thinking though is that if this was built sub250 like it was meant to be, I'm not so sure you need any more standoffs. I doubled down on that by going M2 standoffs. Most other frames out there using only 4 standoffs use M3. I came to this idea when I crashed my Dave_C micro split-S'ing head first into a concrete garbage receptacle. The quad survived even enough to turtle out of it and fly back. That frame uses M2 standoffs.

With that said, I'll be the first to admit these frames were never designed with durability as the priority. Sub250 was the priority.
roninUAV | Purveyor of fine sub-250g FPV drone frames. «» FPV threads

[-] The following 2 users Like the.ronin's post:
  • iFly4rotors, ph2t
Reply
#65
Alright guys the final version of the Ronin is in.  I'm super stoked to say that 1) ... it is still well below 250g despite the added CF ...

[Image: DSC-0087.jpg]

... and 2) the gyro_scaled looks much better than v2 (owing to the thicker CF).

[Image: Gyro-Scaled-Roll.jpg]

[Image: Gyro-Scaled-Pitch.jpg]

And with very aggressive filtering ...

[Image: Screen-Shot-04-29-21-at-01-07-PM-010.jpg]

... we are getting some pretty clean gyro traces ...

[Image: Gyro-Pitch.jpg]

[Image: Gyro-Roll.jpg]

This is a great combination because that means you could probably run 2004s on this thing.  The v1 freaked out like a possessed bat out of hell with 2004s lol.  I have yet to try though because honestly I think the 1404s are a great power system for sub-250.  I also would rather spend the weight on a Insta360 Go replacing the HD split cam.

With that said, the T-Motor 1404 3800KV ran literally warm (but not hot) at D=40.  Normally, they run literally cool leaving me some headroom to go D=45 if I wanted to.  This was odd to me.  But other than that, even with FF=125, the motors did not run any warmer and I've got the PIDs dialed into what I would have generally expected so nothing weird there.


Other than a lot of cosmetic changes and refinements, the biggest structural change from the v2 was a 0.5mm thicker brace plate ...

[Image: DSC-0084.jpg]

The camera cage was also beefed up from a 3mm frame width to 4mm (still 2mm thickness in total) ...

[Image: DSC-0081.jpg]

And the lipo pad ... damn the lipo pad is sick guys!!   ROFL 

[Image: DSC-0080.jpg]
roninUAV | Purveyor of fine sub-250g FPV drone frames. «» FPV threads

[-] The following 4 users Like the.ronin's post:
  • hugnosed_bat, L0stB1t, m3sgal, iFly4rotors
Reply
#66
So this happened ... I was trying to come in low for a sweet juicy flick setup over the small tree ... yea not so much ROFL 



The camera is unharmed thankfully since these whoop split HD cams are out of stock everywhere!  The starboard side cam plate took a beating.  But otherwise good to go lol. 

[Image: DSC-0088.jpg]

[Image: DSC-0089.jpg]

Thumbs Up
roninUAV | Purveyor of fine sub-250g FPV drone frames. «» FPV threads

[-] The following 2 users Like the.ronin's post:
  • iFly4rotors, hugnosed_bat
Reply
#67
ooh noo Undecided
did the sdcard jump out?
Reply
#68
Lol it did but the Runcam Split 4 has a plastic SD card bracket which saved it.
roninUAV | Purveyor of fine sub-250g FPV drone frames. «» FPV threads

Reply
#69
** RONINUAV RONIN MK1 PSA PLEASE READ **

Hey guys and Kaity that purchased the Ronin Mk1, are any of you guys having problems with vibrations or any degree of shakiness even in just your regular FPV cams?

If so, please check your cam cage if it's loose in its top and bottom plate slots.  If it has gotten loose, you can fix this by putting any kind of small bit of tape across the top of those 4 notches  (the 2 that interlock with the top plate and the 2 for the bottom).  Screwing back in the cam cage should be a lot more secure now with even just one layer of tape.

I'm really sorry about this if you are experiencing this problem.  I told the one guy that PM'ed me about this issue that I had opened up all the packaging to redo the kits and make sure the cam cage interlocks were secure.  They may have loosened up over time.  I paid a LOT of attention to these interlocks on all frames after the Ronin Mk1.

If you continue to have issue with it, let me know please here in pm or in public, either way is ok!   Thumbs Up 

Thank you guys!   Thumbs Up 

And Kaity   Thumbs Up
roninUAV | Purveyor of fine sub-250g FPV drone frames. «» FPV threads

[-] The following 1 user Likes the.ronin's post:
  • iFly4rotors
Reply
#70
Hi Ronin,

Thanks for the update. I will keep this in mind on the next MK1 build.

I haven't had any issues, but then I used aluminum cam braces on my Ronin-MK1 ONE due to my tiny camera.
I used the GEPRC Rocket Aluminum Camera Cage. It adds $10.50 to the build, but fits extremely well.

By the way, I like those slots for the cam cage; they allow a bit of front to back movement of the aluminum cage.

Also, I am keeping a list of builds that are using the Ronin MK1 frame HERE.
______________________________________
My BUILDS  ||   My INDEX   ||  Parts Guide  <-- Download


[-] The following 1 user Likes iFly4rotors's post:
  • the.ronin
Reply
#71
Not gonna lie ... this was a freeging blast!!   ROFL



And waddya know???  I prefer biblades for freestyle!   Big Grin   I'm not sure I can articulate exactly why it just feels so damn good.   Thumbs Up
roninUAV | Purveyor of fine sub-250g FPV drone frames. «» FPV threads

[-] The following 4 users Like the.ronin's post:
  • jasperfpv, hugnosed_bat, iFly4rotors, L0stB1t
Reply
#72
Nice video  Cool Sweet  Thumbs Up
______________________________________
My BUILDS  ||   My INDEX   ||  Parts Guide  <-- Download


[-] The following 1 user Likes iFly4rotors's post:
  • the.ronin
Reply
#73
I'll tell ya what ... this time at the park made me realize what the mission of roninUAV has always been.

While I was flying, I could hear someone else ripping in the park!!  In my other video you could see me darting around trying to figure out where this guy was lol.  Later I found him tucked away in the far corner of the park in front of his car flying around in this super tight perimeter he made for himself.  The thing was so freeging loud.  There were kids running around and an outdoor church service or something in the grove near him.  Honestly, I felt bad for the guy as he was clearly trying to keep from bothering people.  And that 5 incher he was ripping was so ridiculously loud that I thought he was much closer to me than he was.

Meanwhile I'm flying all over the place like an idiot bouncing off trees and such covering the entire length of the park LOLLL ... but people didn't care.  If anything they were super curious and I could hear little kids near me yelling out, "I see it there it is!" lolol.  You can even see them eyeing the thing in the video.

See, this (to me, at least) is fun.  Not worrying about other people (*while still flying safe and smart*) is fun.  It really hit home what I'd always suspected - people are generally flying things that are way more than they need to have fun.  So why do they fly them?  I dunno.  Cos a cool guy with a funky mustache flies em?  Whatever the reason, I see it as taking away from the hobby (and lining someone's pockets in the process).

So at that park watching that kid struggle to "have fun" it struck me what the mission of roninUAV has always been:

To make FPV fun.

I've memorialized this concept on the website ...

[Image: Screen-Shot-08-25-21-at-02-31-PM.jpg]
roninUAV | Purveyor of fine sub-250g FPV drone frames. «» FPV threads

[-] The following 3 users Like the.ronin's post:
  • L0stB1t, iFly4rotors, hugnosed_bat
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Build EveScythe Mk1 peveleigh 9 164 Yesterday, 03:25 AM
Last Post: mstc
  A 4" build that never flew (The Ronin mk2 is alive!) drumgod 20 983 12-Dec-2023, 06:34 PM
Last Post: drumgod
  Build 3” roninUAV Sohei MK2 Lemonyleprosy 211 13,914 20-Aug-2023, 11:55 AM
Last Post: iFly4rotors
  Build AOS 3.5 and a RoninUAV Sohei MK2 sevro 43 3,668 10-Jul-2023, 04:48 AM
Last Post: Pathfinder075
  Build 3.5” RoninUAV Sohei MK2 Lemonyleprosy 118 7,048 29-May-2023, 07:05 PM
Last Post: Lemonyleprosy


Login to remove this ad | Register Here