Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 km + Receiver
#1
Hi i would like to have at least 1km of range .But idk what receiver / transmitter choose. I know there is flysky but they only have 500m of range and if i want more i have to buy a module and a transmitter that support a module. Does anyone knows is there is a receiver that have 1km or + range without a module ? (s bus or ibus with failsaife of course)
Thank you
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
#2
all transmitters has an internal module.
to do range, tbs crossfire system is the ways to go. it can provide much more range than one km.
a tbs tango 2 would be a nice transmitter and a crossfire nano receiver.


a less expensive way, a littlebit less: would be the jumper T-lite and an additional crossfire module and a cresf nano rx.
Reply
#3
(30-Jan-2021, 09:37 AM)hugnosed_bat Wrote: all transmitters has an internal module.
to do range, tbs crossfire system is the ways to go. it can provide much more range than one km.
a tbs tango 2 would be a nice transmitter and a crossfire nano receiver.


a less expensive way, a littlebit less: would be the jumper T-lite and an additional crossfire module and a cresf nano rx.

how much does the less expennsive way cost ?
Reply
#4
60 bucks for the nice jumper t-lite
70 bucks for the external module
30 bucks for a receiver

160 bucks




the tbs tango 2 is about 200bucks, 230 with a receiver.
[-] The following 1 user Likes hugnosed_bat's post:
  • Pierre
Reply
#5
(30-Jan-2021, 09:44 AM)hugnosed_bat Wrote: 60 bucks for the nice jumper t-lite
70 bucks for the external module
30 bucks for a receiver

160 bucks




the tbs tango 2 is about 200bucks, 230 with a receiver.

Thank you  Thumbs Up Thumbs Up Thumbs Up
Reply
#6
of you dont like "gamestyle" controllers, you would need a jumper or radiomaster tx16s, but it would go more expensive than the tango, paired with a module and receiver.
Reply
#7
(30-Jan-2021, 09:49 AM)hugnosed_bat Wrote: of you dont like "gamestyle" controllers, you would need a jumper or radiomaster tx16s, but it would go more expensive than the tango, paired with a module and receiver.

yeah it's not my cup of tea but 200 $ for a radio is a little bit too much
Reply
#8
just to mention about a goggle or transmitter last long, they dont crash... its a good idea to spend money there if you can

crossfire is faraway ahead, the receivers are expensive at 30, but its worse the money :-)
Reply
#9
(30-Jan-2021, 10:07 AM)hugnosed_bat Wrote: just to mention about a goggle or transmitter last long, they dont crash... its a good idea to spend money there if you can

crossfire is faraway ahead, the receivers are expensive at 30, but its worse the money :-)

True . with a 700$ machine in the air it will be stupid to crash because of cheap stuff on the ground
Reply
#10
You mentioned Flysky. Its not bad. Few good receivers.
I did antenna mod on FS i6. A lot depends on antenna placement, and line of sight.

Did 700m and 900m tests 2 years ago:
X6B. Fli10. Flit14+(replaced antenna).

Most where weak, but ok (sig8-10, 40%+). Better with patch antenna. Sadly, I had lots of failsafe fall outa sky doing turns/flips, where antenna was poor position.
Similar to QX7 and R-XSR,

More recently bought XR602T-A. It claims 2km range.
[-] The following 1 user Likes romangpro's post:
  • Pierre
Reply
#11
(31-Jan-2021, 07:13 AM)romangpro Wrote: You mentioned Flysky. Its not bad. Few good receivers.
I did antenna mod on FS i6. A lot depends on antenna placement, and line of sight.

Did 700m and 900m tests 2 years ago:
X6B. Fli10. Flit14+(replaced antenna).

Most where weak, but ok (sig8-10, 40%+). Better with patch antenna. Sadly, I had lots of failsafe fall outa sky doing turns/flips, where antenna was poor position.
Similar to QX7 and R-XSR,

More recently bought XR602T-A. It claims 2km range.

i will go for a taranis  qx7 and a xm+ receiver .it should do the job Thumbs Up
Reply
#12
All the old 2.4ghz are pretty much the same.
With proper 30.5mm antenna, especially 10-14dbm patch/directional on Tx, you can stretch typical 1km, to 4-6km. And all radio can be mod to output higher power. But, regardless, when behind dense trees, it will fail. Its 2.4ghz. Flysky/Frsky/Spectrum/Futaba - doesnt matter.

If you want "real" and stable 1km+ (or 20km+):
900Mhz TBS Crossfire (CSS modulation) - excellent support
900Mhz Frsky R9M
2.4Ghz Flysky ADH3 - new and very limited compatibility
2.4Ghz ImmersionRC Ghost (CSS modulation)
900/2.4 ExpressLRS <<-- I ordered PCBs and building 900 mini RX on top of flashing R9M

In terms of performance, ExpressLRS claims to be #1. But its still "beta". Likewise, Ghost is very good, but very new. Proven and full support - Crossfire. But 900Mhz antenna are big for micros.
Reply
#13
My QX7 and XM+ RX’s have been out to 1200 meters.  Not a lot of confidence, but they will work.  I have never had a failsafe with that combination inside of 700 meters.  My R9M on my seven inch cruiser has been out to 3.5km and it had a strong connection, even behind cover that caused my video to cease to be viable.  Thankfully the craft in an INAV build and the waypoint navigation worked to get it back into video range.

I have been flying 900mhz for a while now, even on my micros.  The antenna are not that big, even the T style.  

[Image: n3qNKc6l.jpg]

This is my Japalura with an R9MM receiver.  The T antenna kept catching on things so I shifted back to the stock antenna and ran it out on the arm.  It has been out to 2km in that configuration, but the battery came back deflated...this thing is not at all efficient.

The 900mhz systems will allow you better connectivity.
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Best Receiver for Long Range? durachoke 10 3,440 08-Dec-2021, 10:17 PM
Last Post: GiantAntCowboy
  TBS nano receiver RSSI issue Sebalos 57 5,229 30-May-2020, 02:33 AM
Last Post: Sebalos
  Help Help with choosing suitable camera, transmitter and receiver for fpv markonjak1 0 460 04-Nov-2019, 08:47 AM
Last Post: markonjak1
  FrSky R9M Lite Transmitter module & R9MM mini receiver - long range low latency Bill M-RC 1 837 06-Jun-2019, 01:50 AM
Last Post: Aryan
  Quanum Overlord 6-Way Diversity Receiver Skypod 5 1,096 17-Dec-2018, 04:00 AM
Last Post: voodoo614


Login to remove this ad | Register Here