Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.
IntoFPV Forum › General Discussion › Mini Quad v
Solved Remote controller for Tinyhawk 2 freestyle

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Remote controller for Tinyhawk 2 freestyle
Krayon70 Offline
Member
*
Posts: 66
Threads: 17
Likes Received: 5 in 5 posts
Likes Given: 46
Joined: Jun 2021
Reputation: 0
#1
05-Jul-2021, 05:04 PM (This post was last modified: 06-Jul-2021, 03:19 PM by Krayon70.)
Hi,
I have an Frsky Taranis X9 Lite...
Is it compatible with the Tinyhawk 2 Freestyle ? (i'm waiting for delivery)
It seems i have to buy an Mutliprotocol Module... Is it correct ?
I would to know if it will be more simple to buy an Taranis QX7... What did you think ?
Thanks for answer...
Regards
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
voodoo614 Offline
¯\(°_o)/¯
******
Pole Dancer Popular Member Posting Freak Quad Builder Scuba Diver Tree Hugger Tutorial Writer
Posts: 12,099
Threads: 125
Likes Received: 3,739 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 99
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 388
#2
05-Jul-2021, 06:31 PM
Natively no, it is not compatible. The quad is D8 compatible and the radio does not have a D8 mode.

There are ways around if you want to do it. Like but multi-protocol module for the radio or put in a different receiver.
[-] The following 1 user Likes voodoo614's post:
  • Krayon70
Reply
Krayon70 Offline
Member
*
Posts: 66
Threads: 17
Likes Received: 5 in 5 posts
Likes Given: 46
Joined: Jun 2021
Reputation: 0
#3
05-Jul-2021, 06:47 PM
(05-Jul-2021, 06:31 PM)voodoo614 Wrote: Natively no, it is not compatible. The quad is D8 compatible and the radio does not have a D8 mode.

There are ways around if you want to do it. Like but multi-protocol module for the radio or put in a different receiver.
Thanks,
But is the QX7 natively compatible with D8 ?
Regards
Reply
SnowLeopardFPV Offline
Member
******
Pole Dancer Popular Member Posting Freak Tree Hugger Whoopee Owner
Posts: 21,204
Threads: 583
Likes Received: 8,941 in 6,616 posts
Likes Given: 1,425
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation: 786
#4
05-Jul-2021, 08:09 PM
(05-Jul-2021, 06:47 PM)Krayon70 Wrote: But is the QX7 natively compatible with D8 ?

Yes, as long as you get the original ACCST version of the QX7 and not the newer ACCESS version.

Your best option IMO is to get one of the LITE multiprotocol modules to go into your X9 Lite. Then you will have a single transmitter that can bind to virtually any 2.4GHz receiver. The available compatible LITE modules are the Vantac MPM, iRangeX IRX4 Lite, and the TBS MPM.
[-] The following 1 user Likes SnowLeopardFPV's post:
  • Krayon70
Reply
Rob Axel Offline
Member
*
Posting Freak
Posts: 2,341
Threads: 117
Likes Received: 811 in 658 posts
Likes Given: 126
Joined: Feb 2021
Reputation: 20
#5
05-Jul-2021, 08:46 PM (This post was last modified: 05-Jul-2021, 08:48 PM by Rob Axel.)
+1^^^
Frsky “hasn’t been playing well with others” since their new updates…
[-] The following 1 user Likes Rob Axel's post:
  • Krayon70
Reply
emsee Offline
Member
*
Posts: 37
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 28 in 19 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Oct 2020
Reputation: 2
#6
06-Jul-2021, 12:11 AM
Was in same situation last year, and I couldn't find Vantac or iRangeX in stock so I opted for the FrSky XJT Lite module.  It's not multi-protocol like the others, but if all that's desired is D8 support (or D16), I think its a decent choice -- and I recall it being a fair bit cheaper than the others (don't know if that's still the case).
[-] The following 2 users Like emsee's post:
  • Gruv, Krayon70
Reply
Krayon70 Offline
Member
*
Posts: 66
Threads: 17
Likes Received: 5 in 5 posts
Likes Given: 46
Joined: Jun 2021
Reputation: 0
#7
06-Jul-2021, 03:17 PM
(06-Jul-2021, 12:11 AM)emsee Wrote: Was in same situation last year, and I couldn't find Vantac or iRangeX in stock so I opted for the FrSky XJT Lite module.  It's not multi-protocol like the others, but if all that's desired is D8 support (or D16), I think its a decent choice -- and I recall it being a fair bit cheaper than the others (don't know if that's still the case).
Hi,
It seem to be the best choice...
Thanks.

Regards.
Reply
Krayon70 Offline
Member
*
Posts: 66
Threads: 17
Likes Received: 5 in 5 posts
Likes Given: 46
Joined: Jun 2021
Reputation: 0
#8
06-Jul-2021, 03:18 PM
Thanks to everybody for replies !
Regards
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  4-6" lightweight quads for freestyle and looks husafreak 25 1,205 04-Mar-2024, 05:46 PM
Last Post: husafreak
  Discussion Who's Got the Heaviest 5" Freestyle Quad? SnowLeopardFPV 9 5,376 26-Jan-2024, 12:18 PM
Last Post: hawk01
  4" Freestyle Build Pathfinder075 8 468 03-Nov-2023, 02:32 PM
Last Post: skywanderer
  EMax Tinyhawk FREESTYLE III HDZero/ELRS BadRaven 1 426 27-Oct-2023, 08:07 AM
Last Post: BadRaven
  New TH3 Freestyle Dak_4008 6 427 06-Oct-2023, 07:24 PM
Last Post: Dak_4008


Login to remove this ad | Register Here