HEY folks

Is the reason for the low of channels to increase latency because they occupy frequencies?


Why do many channels reduce latency ?

about dji hd transmission or walksail?

I don’t understand your question, can you elaborate?

dji has 25mbps or 50mps mode. 50mbps does double the data and does need more frequency range, therefor more channels

(17-Sep-2023, 09:29 PM)Lemonyleprosy Wrote: I don’t understand your question, can you elaborate?

Why does the latency  decrease as the channels increase?

Meaning:

8 Channels with a latency of less than 16 channels

your question isnt more clear to me. what kind of channels?

i dont know any system which does use 16channels for videobtransmission.
as told above, channels doesnt matter, they represent a range of frequency. more range of frequency can carry more data the same way, more data can cause more accuracy/a better linkstability or better resolution.

channels doesnt anything with the latency, amount of data and how much bandwidth, might be what you are aiming by mention "number of channels"

(18-Sep-2023, 09:24 AM)hugnosed_bat Wrote: your question isnt more clear to me. what kind of channels?

i dont know any system which does use 16channels for videobtransmission.
as told above, channels doesnt matter, they represent a range of frequency. more range of frequency can carry more data the same way, more data can cause more accuracy/a better linkstability or better resolution.

channels doesnt anything with the latency, amount of data and how much bandwidth, might be what you are aiming by mention "number of channels"

https://oscarliang.com/improve-radio-con...20to%20End

in case of rclink, rc channels.
a protocoll with lower channel number does carry less data, can be faster therefor.
its not so much about the number of channels its more about the transmission protocoll. i beleieve you are asking for frsky 16channels against 8channels on sbus protocoll?
dont be shy, describe your question more.

Maybe you misread the article, the opposite applies. Less channels equals less data equals less latency.

Quote:Some common systems have very obvious breakpoints – for example FrSky D16 on 8 channels is twice as fast as D16 using 9-16 channels, for both SBUS and F.Port. Helpfully, there are ways to fit virtually every necessary function into 5-8 channels.

(18-Sep-2023, 10:26 AM)hugnosed_bat Wrote: in case of rclink, rc channels.
a protocoll with lower channel number does carry less data, can be faster therefor.
its not so much about the number of channels its more about the transmission protocoll. i beleieve you are asking for frsky 16channels against 8channels on sbus protocoll?
dont be shy, describe your question more.

Do you mean that only the S-BUS system. The fewer channels, the less LETANCY?