The first 1S 65mm whoop to market with 35mm props...

https://www.banggood.com/21g-Eachine-UZ65-65mm-1S-Whoop-FPV-Racing-Drone-BNF-Runcam-Nano3-35mm-Propeller-5_8G-25100mW-VTX-p-1640609.html

Specifications:
Brand Name: Eachine
Item Name: UZ65 65mm FPV Racing Drone
Wheelbase: 65mm
Size: 80mm*80mm*40mm
Weight(without battery): 21g
Weight(with battery): 29g
Receiver option:
Internal SPI Frsky version (Compatible with ACCST D8/D16, Recommend D8 mode)
Internal SPI Flysky version(Compatible with AFHDS and AFHDS-2A Flysky transmitter)
External DSM2/DSMX Receiver version(Compatible with Spektrum DX6I/DX7/DX8/DX9)
External TBS Crossfire Nano RX version(Compatible with TBS transmitter)

Features:
The smallest 1-2s 3 in 1 flight controller built-in ESC, Receiver
The world first 65mm whoop with 35mm propellers
Runcam Nano3 The lightest 1/3 CMOS 800TVL Camera
Smooth and powerful
Compatible for 1S Lipo/LIHV
Camera Angle adjustable
5.8G 25~100mW VTX

   

Albert Kim is first to the post with a review.

A few disappointing aspects to the UZ65 are the 15-20 degree narrower field of view on the Runcam Nano 3 due the new lens they now use (the older RunCam Nano 3 as used on the Mobula6 had a different lens but was more prone to breaking), and also the minimum camera angle is 40 degrees which can't be lowered any more than that due to the camera mount clashing with the VTX board. So trying to make this so whoop so small with larger props has clearly resulted in a few usability issues.

That said, this is something a little bit different to the other normal 65mm whoops which all just look about the same. I guess this one is mainly useful for outdoor use rather than slow graceful flying indoors which is probably going to be difficult with that acute camera angle.



I also found this random video as well but that is it so far for the UZ65. Not surprising though because Banggood only started shipping it about a week ago. I'm sure more reviews will now also start appearing.

Another review if the UZ65 by Jon. This one has the Crossfire Nano RX installed.

It's cool to keep these things as small as possible to do crazy whoop flying style. Just look at the whoop videos on tinywhoop.com and Airvuz - i assume they are done using 1S. They put the 0802 motors on this - which was a recommended upgrade for the US/UK65. I got the UK65 on special from banggood recently and ordered those motors at the weekend, plus the frame only lasted about 10 flights so that as replaced. So i've probably spent more than this UZ65..damn! This UZ65 looks like they took all the upgrades from the UK/US65 and made a UZ65.....i guess the US/UK65 was some years old so this will have latest and greatest tech.....i wonder how long the battery lasts though. Those motors are supposed to be more efficient. They give you a 300mAH one compared to 250 for the UK/US65. Hopefully this UZ65 has it all out of the box no need to upgrade parts?!

(24-May-2020, 02:24 AM)robster Wrote: I got the UK65 on special from banggood recently and ordered those motors at the weekend, plus the frame only lasted about 10 flights so that as replaced.  So i've probably spent more than this UZ65..damn!  This UZ65 looks like they took all the upgrades from the UK/US65 and made a UZ65.....i guess the US/UK65 was some years old so this will have latest and greatest tech.....i wonder how long the battery lasts though.  Those motors are supposed to be more efficient.  They give you a 300mAH one compared to 250 for the UK/US65.  Hopefully this UZ65 has it all out of the box no need to upgrade parts?!

The US65 and UK65 was released about a year and a half ago. Unfortunately, yes, the frame is like honeycomb. The UR65 uses exactly the same design frame as the US65/UK65 but the difference is that it's flexible unlike the US65 / UK65 frame so it just flexes in a crash rather than breaks. It's white though so you don;t get the starts & stripes or Union Jack livery.

I flashed the ESCs on my UK65 to 48KHz firmware and I can get 3 minutes of flying time out of a 300mAh 1S LiPo.

The UZ65 unfortunately has a crap camera and you can't lower the tilt due to a design flaw so you may need to (or have to) change/upgrade that.

I don't really watch the UAVFutures channel much anymore but I noticed that Stew has a done a comparison between the Mobula6 and the UZ65 so I thought I'd stick it here for anyone interested.

A review of the UZ65 from Andy. It's looking like the Mobula6 is probably the better option of the two if you don't mind the jello.

Lee's and Wayne's reviews of the UZ65...

How to fix the problem with the steep camera tilt angle on the UZ65...