Welcome, Guest | You have to register before you can post on our site. | Forum Statistics | » Members: 17,504 » Latest member: Shoto » Forum threads: 22,957 » Forum posts: 208,927
Full Statistics | Online Users | There are currently 178 online users. » 8 Member(s) | 165 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing, Facebook, Google, Yandex, DC nordiC, Defy1723, FPVme, MomoBrut, PeladoMat, soldierace, william_hunter | | | Transitioning from 4s to 6s: Motor KV and Props Relationship | Posted by: soldierace - 23-Apr-2024, 06:36 PM - Forum: Beginner Questions - Replies (9) | | HI, I have some doubtsI have a question, I'm about to switch from 4s to 6s, simply to experiment with the differences. I understand why the use of 6s has become the standard, but I already have very good power and agility with 4s using a 2207 motor of 2400kv in a drone with a standard weight of 700g, and I haven't felt the need to make the change. However, it seems that the time has come to try it out. If I calculate with the battery I currently use, it would be 16.8v, resulting in 40,320 rpm at maximum throttle, which I understand is the maximum speed at which the motor wants to spin without considering other factors. It's known that for 6s, motors between 1700kv and 1900kv should be used, and listening to more knowledgeable people in the field like Chris Rosser, I understand that if I want to use my drone for freestyle to avoid turbulence and poor performance, I should use props with a low angle of attack like 5043, 5040, or 5031, and to compensate for the lack of power, use motors with higher kv, which I imagine would be 1900kv or even 2000kv. I'm not sure if this combination of kv and props will give me good results in smooth flight. I know that my batteries can supply the maximum amperage required by most motors to consider. For example, the 2207 eco II generates a peak current of 38A * 4 with 505.5 props, which would be 152A for all 4 motors, and my 1.3Ah battery with 120c gives me a maximum current draw of 156A. So, my question is, what benefits would lower kv motors like 1700kv offer compared to higher ones, or if it's worth staying in a middle point like 1800 or 1855kv. I've also heard that people recommend using 2400kv motors and limiting the throttle to compensate for the high RPMs of this combination, but I've also heard that this has a probability of burning my ESC. In the end, with so much information, I don't know which combination would be best for me between props and kv. I must say that the flying style I like is a combination of aggressiveness and smoothness in flight, so I imagine that what would suit me would be a setup that has control and good response at medium and low throttle, and also at high throttle. What do you think? | | | problems connecting and writing code for the remote (esp32) and the flight controller | Posted by: YarikVor - 23-Apr-2024, 02:56 PM - Forum: Beginner Questions - Replies (2) | | As a beginner, I'm attempting to establish a connection via RX/TX and simulate the operation of a remote control by changing channel values for the flight controller. I'm using Betaflight to verify the state of the channels, where UART2 (Serial RX) is engaged. For the remote control, I've specified Serial (via UART) + CRSF + Telemetry. Additionally, I've utilized the AlfredoCRSF library for operation. However, the channel values in the receiver tab are not changing. Below is the code snippet: [color=var(--text-secondary)][font=Söhne, ui-sans-serif, system-ui, -apple-system,]cpp[font=Söhne, ui-sans-serif, system-ui, -apple-system,]Copy code[/font][/font][/color] Code: #include <AlfredoCRSF.h> #include <HardwareSerial.h> // Set up a new Serial object AlfredoCRSF crsf; void setup() { Serial.begin(115200); Serial.println("COM Serial initialized"); Serial2.begin(CRSF_BAUDRATE); crsf.begin(Serial2); } void loop() { // Must call crsf.update() in loop() to process data crsf.update(); crsf_channels_t channels { .ch0 = 1200, .ch1 = 1201, .ch2 = 1202, .ch3 = 1203, .ch4 = 1204, .ch5 = 64 }; crsf.queuePacket(CRSF_ADDRESS_FLIGHT_CONTROLLER, CRSF_FRAMETYPE_RC_CHANNELS_PACKED, &channels, sizeof(channels)); delay(200); }
In this code, I'm initializing the serial communication and CRSF library. Then, in the loop() function, I'm updating the CRSF data and specifying channel values. However, the channel values are not reflected in the receiver tab of Betaflight as expected. | | | Should you update firmware? | Posted by: Rob Axel - 23-Apr-2024, 10:39 AM - Forum: Beginner Questions - Replies (19) | | Well, I used to think that was a “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” frame of thought… plus learning the new stuff (edgeTX, ELRS betaflight) can be a time suck! Not to mention the spare time you have you want to be flying.. I am discovering you “should, kinda” update if / when u get the chance…You can learn it now, or be forced to learn it later… … I recently acquired the new mob6 HDZ 2024, if ur not familiar with this whoop.. it comes with ELRS. Now I made the jump to crossfire from Frsky after having multiple close proximity failsafes ans Frsky “updated” their protocol and no longer supported D-8. I have a few whoops and small quads on D-8. Simple, go CrossFire for large quads and leave the small stuff on Frsky.. For my module, and nano RXs.. installed. No issues.. until I wanted to purchase another rx.. they were always out of stock.. and price jumped to $30 a pop!.. ELRS had JUST started gaining ground.. already being burned by 2 protocols, a whoop fc had been released with crossfire.. I decided to “bite the bullit” and stick with TBS, “cheap insurance”… Back to the new (ELRS) whoop..and my new ELRS module…just pop it into my Taranis bay.. install, update, bind and fly.. right.. WRONG!!! I’m still running Open Tx 2.2.*… ELRS Required 2.3.*… So here I am licking my wounds.. from dragging my feet and not updating open tx -or edgeTX .. This also goes for betaflight..I still have whoops on 3.5.3 .. and they fly great..but if I want all the “options”.. I’m gonna ave to put on my big boy pants and learn some new stuff… Do it now or later.. the choice it’s yours .. but at one point your hand may be forced… | | | Volador VX3 | Posted by: Pathfinder075 - 23-Apr-2024, 02:08 AM - Forum: Frame - Replies (2) | | Is anyone using it in a build and if so, could they answer me a question. Will it take motors that use a 12x12 mount pattern or is it 9x9 mount only? | | | |