Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Just a heads up that the FAA is out there enforcing the rules...
#1
Just a heads up that the FAA is out there enforcing the rules...

According to this facebook post, the FAA showed up at an AMA field that does not yet have an exception for flying near an airport and was briefly shut down.  So even though I strongly disagree with the state of our current regulations, I encourage everyone to fly safe and follow the rules and hopefully we can get the FAA to work with us to make the regulations a little bit more reasonable.
Like listening to 80s and 90s music?  Perhaps you will like my FPV Channel.
Concerned about regulations?  Join the FPV Freedom Coalition.
[-] The following 2 users Like 5zero7rc's post:
  • Krohsis, voodoo614
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
#2
Thank you for the heads up.
Reply
#3
Wow, that's in my neck of the woods. I've never flown there, not an AMA member, but sometimes stop by during my lunch hour to see what's flying. They have a normal airstrip and a separate drone field with a racetrack.
Reply
#4
Oh, fancy card. Wonder if he has a cool badge to match. Obviously saving countless lives with his due diligence. We applaud you "Special Agent" Bumberger....

Wonder if the fact it happened in California has anything to so with the overzealous enforcement....

Deal
Here's the Deal

10" 6S FR10-G Long Range, 5" 6S Rooster, 5" 6S Badger, 5" 6S QAV-S, 5" 4S Badger, 5" 4S Phreakstyle Slam, 5" 6S Yema, 5" 4S Stark, 3" 4S Gecko, and a 3S 2.5" Tadpole, all of which are Crossfire.  Tinyhawk, Tinyhawk S, and a DJI Spark.  And projects on the bench....

Reply
#5
I think an AMA field will get a lot more attention due to the density of flying than Joe Blow out flying in a field by him/herself or even in a low use park.   This is particularly true if the AMA field is in a controlled airspace.

As for me, I don't get to fly if I'm not breaking at least one rule, LOS.....so I'm an outlaw I guess.  But I'm sure I'm in good company, because most if not all of us on this forum are breaking some federal, state, or local law every time we fly. Big Grin



Reply
#6
As this field is next to Sea World and almost within LOS of San Diego INTL, it sort of makes sense they would be a lightening rod for scrutiny/"enforcement". I have always wondered how they gained permission to fly so close to a major air hub.
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
Reply
#7
(02-Jul-2019, 01:18 PM)Krohsis Wrote: As for me, I don't get to fly if I'm not breaking at least one rule, LOS.....so I'm an outlaw I guess.  But I'm sure I'm in good company, because most if not all of us on this forum are breaking some federal, state, or local law every time we fly. Big Grin

It is possible to fly FPV without breaking the LOS rule if you have someone else along with you to be your spotter.  Unfortunately a pet dog does not count.  They are probably a much better spotter than anyone else I can think of Smile
Like listening to 80s and 90s music?  Perhaps you will like my FPV Channel.
Concerned about regulations?  Join the FPV Freedom Coalition.
Reply
#8
(02-Jul-2019, 01:54 PM)5zero7rc Wrote: It is possible to fly FPV without breaking the LOS rule if you have someone else along with you to be your spotter.  Unfortunately a pet dog does not count.  They are probably a much better spotter than anyone else I can think of Smile

But if you fly more than half a mile out (BVLOS) like the long rangers do, then having a spotter is about as much use as a chocolate teapot. This is what I don't really get about some of these rules. They may as well just say FPV is banned and be done with it. I guarantee that a majority of people flying any kind of FPV are doing so illegally, and I'm pretty sure that is the way people are going to continue. They will just take their chances.
Reply
#9
(02-Jul-2019, 01:54 PM)5zero7rc Wrote: It is possible to fly FPV without breaking the LOS rule if you have someone else along with you to be your spotter.  Unfortunately a pet dog does not count.  They are probably a much better spotter than anyone else I can think of Smile

Yeah, I'm familiar with the regulation.  Trouble is, it would take a lot of people to fly a 8 miles out flight(my personal max so far, and even harder for those with wings at over 20 miles) and a logistical nightmare to stay in communication, and all for what?  I don't believe there ever has been a significant safety issue arising out of FPV without a spotter.  And there have been over thousands of those flights, possibly tens of thousands of flights.  Yet, a guy can buy an ultralight and fly anywhere with less regs and no licensing.  They can fly over population dense areas and around areas we are not to fly like over highways and bridges.  And they average 80 fatalities a year.  Usually the fatalities are the pilot alone, but there have been innocents killed as well.  And the property damage outside of the aircraft from the crashes is high.  How many fatalities have occurred from FPV without a spotter?  I'm speculating, but I bet none, ever.  

My flying without a spotter garners the same fine and level of penalty as your flying Dan without a Ham license.  And in the end, really neither should be that big of a deal.  These are the kinds of things FPVFC should be battling the FAA on.



Reply
#10
(02-Jul-2019, 02:49 PM)SnowLeopardFPV Wrote: But if you fly more than half a mile out (BVLOS) like the long rangers do, then having a spotter is about as much use as a chocolate teapot. This is what I don't really get about some of these rules. They may as well just say FPV is banned and be done with it. I guarantee that a majority of people flying any kind of FPV are doing so illegally, and I'm pretty sure that is the way people are going to continue. They will just take their chances.

Ahhhh, but prove they could not see it!  My partner has awesome vision!
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
[-] The following 1 user Likes kaitylynn's post:
  • Krohsis
Reply
#11
(02-Jul-2019, 03:51 PM)Krohsis Wrote: My flying without a spotter garners the same fine and level of penalty as your flying Dan without a Ham license.  And in the end, really neither should be that big of a deal.  These are the kinds of things FPVFC should be battling the FAA on.

No comment on the other regulations I may or may not be breaking on a regular basis, but I did just finish taking a HAM radio class.  Just need to wait for the next test to be offered in my area and hopefully pass it Smile

(03-Jul-2019, 12:55 AM)kaitylynn Wrote: Ahhhh, but prove they could not see it!  My partner has awesome vision!

Just fly at night. Put a bright light on your quad and I bet you can see that thing 10+ miles away.  According to the latest video from the FAA, you can fly at night for recreational purposes as long as you are within line of sight.  Smile
Like listening to 80s and 90s music?  Perhaps you will like my FPV Channel.
Concerned about regulations?  Join the FPV Freedom Coalition.
Reply
#12
(03-Jul-2019, 03:11 AM)5zero7rc Wrote: No comment on the other regulations I may or may not be breaking on a regular basis, but I did just finish taking a HAM radio class.  Just need to wait for the next test to be offered in my area and hopefully pass it Smile


Just fly at night. Put a bright light on your quad and I bet you can see that thing 10+ miles away.  According to the latest video from the FAA, you can fly at night for recreational purposes as long as you are within line of sight.  Smile


I never break any rules.

LOL on the night flying.  That is the first thing my mind wandered on to is lit, night, LR! Smile
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
Reply
#13
(03-Jul-2019, 12:55 AM)kaitylynn Wrote: Ahhhh, but prove they could not see it!  My partner has awesome vision!

I like how you think, Kaity



Reply
#14
(03-Jul-2019, 03:11 AM)5zero7rc Wrote: No comment on the other regulations I may or may not be breaking on a regular basis, but I did just finish taking a HAM radio class.  Just need to wait for the next test to be offered in my area and hopefully pass it Smile


See, soon you will be more legal and I will still be flying LR without a spotter.



Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Happy FAA/RID Day, America !!! QuadFlyer68 42 1,561 24-Mar-2024, 05:21 PM
Last Post: QuadFlyer68
  Announcement FAA Drone Public Awareness Brief (Zoom Meeting) on December 6th 2023 @ 18:30 ET Rob Axel 30 1,261 10-Dec-2023, 05:43 PM
Last Post: Rob Axel
  Announcement Remote ID - RDQ vs FAA -> RDQ Loses, FAA Wins SnowLeopardFPV 393 38,136 20-Sep-2023, 01:36 AM
Last Post: SnowLeopardFPV
  Announcement FAA Making CBO's Change Their Rules SnowLeopardFPV 2 489 24-Mar-2023, 02:05 PM
Last Post: SnowLeopardFPV
  Announcement New FAA Recreational Drone Rules are Coming SnowLeopardFPV 44 2,719 07-Jan-2023, 12:48 AM
Last Post: SnowLeopardFPV


Login to remove this ad | Register Here