11-Aug-2020, 12:17 PM (This post was last modified: 11-Aug-2020, 12:19 PM by ivanwong1989.)
(11-Aug-2020, 12:12 PM)bLoWsMokE Wrote: I'm not sure what this means. "Looking at the apex's spectrum"
For a completely unfiltered gyro I would expect to see noise like that, if there wasn't any like that then the filters would be redundant, so that is their purpose. I have nothing else to compare it to because I haven't seen unfiltered gyro noise before, but I've seen filtered gyro's look like that, and THAT is bad.
Your filtered gyro is cleaner than Ronins and is pretty much as clean as it can possibly be. I'm actually kind of confused now because your reaction to Ronins graph implies that you are impressed with how clean the noise was on his graph.... but then on the other hand you showing pictures of your gyro looking cleaner after you turned the filters on, which implies that you already knew it would look like that....... These are conflicting implications, so I'm not quite sure what to make of it.
Hmm. I was thinking that d.ronin's apex noise graph is pre-filtered. LOL. That's why i was in awe. LOL.
I shouldn't be saying plural CAPS. oops. It';s a single capacitor across the battery leads/pads.
True. I see your point now. I think I am chasing the rabbit hole where I was thinking that pre-filtered noise have to be extremely clean before proceeding with the rest and finally having fun flying.
Was going around this pre-filtered graph and trying to move my wires, strap them down, remount the fc, move the filters, and my next plan is puttin a capacitor to the input voltage for the FC.
Perhaps I should not chase the rabbit if the post-filtered graph is acceptable.