Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
bad framedesign: betafpv x-knight 4“
#1
i used the betafpv x-knight 4inch frame, first gently crash and its broken. there is no motor protection so i loose a motor aswell. it doesnt make any sense to use high quality carbon with a that bad design. seems like a sell-system.
some delaminated carbon seems to be a dream on this frame xD dont buy!

not much good 4inch ul frame options Undecided

[Image: lznFcsol.jpg]
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
#2
Sad  That sucks!

It looks like it sheered the carbon right off.
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
[-] The following 1 user Likes kaitylynn's post:
  • hugnosed_bat
Reply
#3
after some time, i bought a spare arm, allready i dont know why i did this...

the next crash was for the canopy, the canopy is pretty rigid - much more than the bottom plate where it is attached. the bottom plate is broken now. i can not understand, a frame cant be much less toughtfull, or its probably not a mistake - a sell system.
the canopy is well, one esc is broken, physical force from the bottomplate... xD

i can not understand why betafpv sell somthing that bad, its an art to design such a bad frame, i hadnt any frame that bad - i use several ultralight frames, no one had such issues or mistakes.

do not buy this frame, its worse a try.
i will try the tbs source podracer 4“ frame, no fear i will get near trubles with a tbs product.

the x-knight 4inch frame is a bad joke for the progress in frame-technology we have today
Reply
#4
I had a 5 inch X Knight build and it was jinxed build for me with multiple burnt AIO FCs/motor.

The flimsy plate also broke on mine after a fairly mild crash due to the impact transferred from the hard canopy. The canopy support plate is so piss weak.

Transferred the parts to RacerX ET5 frame since and never going to touch this crappy thing again.

[Image: 20200626-105355.jpg]
YouTube - Juicy FPV Journey
[-] The following 1 user Likes jasperfpv's post:
  • hugnosed_bat
Reply
#5
Another BetaFPV X-Knight 4-Inch frame casualty...

[-] The following 1 user Likes SnowLeopardFPV's post:
  • hugnosed_bat
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  BetaFPV 75 Frames BadRaven 0 257 21-Mar-2023, 10:47 AM
Last Post: BadRaven
  deadcat framedesign compared to others hugnosed_bat 2 5,889 21-Aug-2019, 04:16 AM
Last Post: hugnosed_bat


Login to remove this ad | Register Here