Posts: 1,290 Threads: 67 Likes Received: 711 in 472 posts Likes Given: 1,216 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 23 Hi Guys and Gals... I will be starting a new build soon and thought I would go ahead and post a few pics of the components and a parts list. I will probably be several weeks before I complete it as I have a few other irons in the fire at the moment. Once I'm finished I'll come back and post a few pics. Here we go...... Frame: Pyro-Drone Hyperlite FLOSS "2" Racing Frame - 5.5" FC: BARDWELL F4 FLIGHT CONTROLLER - AIO FC **** OR **** Holybro Kakute F4 AIO. Still up in the air as to which one I'll use......I don't know that I'll have the clearance with the Holybro due to the elevated gyro. ESC: SPEDIX 30A 4 IN 1 ESC RX: FRSKY R-XSR RECEIVER VTX: Mach 1 Video Transmitter - 25/200/600m FPV Camera: RunCam Micro Swift 2 Motors: EMAX LITE SPEC LS2206 2300KV RACING / FREESTYLE MOTOR Props: Cyclone 5040 Freestyle DAL Prop - 5" Tri Blade (or whatever I can scrounge up at the time.) Comments/Suggestions? "Damn the torpedoes!!! Full speed ahead!!!" Posts: 2,286 Threads: 38 Likes Received: 1,527 in 995 posts Likes Given: 1,881 Joined: Apr 2016 Reputation: 72 That's a nice set of components! It should be a fast one with that ultra light frame. There looks to be plenty of room between the lower and upper plates, so I reckon you'll be able to fit either flight controller in a two board stack. Posts: 1,290 Threads: 67 Likes Received: 711 in 472 posts Likes Given: 1,216 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 23 (16-Jan-2018, 08:47 AM)unseen Wrote: That's a nice set of components! It should be a fast one with that ultra light frame. There looks to be plenty of room between the lower and upper plates, so I reckon you'll be able to fit either flight controller in a two board stack. I normally try and get everything in one stack (VTX and RX as well). IF the Holybro prevents me from stacking everything due to it's extra height, then I use the JB FC, if not, I may use the Holybro and save the other one for my next build. Additionally, there are two ways to put that frame together, one offering about 4mm more clearance then the other. I would like to use the lower profile configuration, but if it makes the difference between stacking everything in one stack, I'll probably go with taller frame option. "Damn the torpedoes!!! Full speed ahead!!!" Posts: 5,315 Threads: 672 Likes Received: 3,155 in 1,743 posts Likes Given: 2,030 Joined: Jan 2016 Reputation: 139 Looking forward to that, i am interested what the final weight would be as I am also planning building a light weight racer. If you are using the JBF4, love to hear your thought on it as how easy it is to build and reliability. Posts: 1,290 Threads: 67 Likes Received: 711 in 472 posts Likes Given: 1,216 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 23 (18-Jan-2018, 01:23 PM)Oscar Wrote: Looking forward to that, i am interested what the final weight would be as I am also planning building a light weight racer. If you are using the JBF4, love to hear your thought on it as how easy it is to build and reliability. Will report back......if I run into any significant problems, I'll post about 'em. "Damn the torpedoes!!! Full speed ahead!!!" • Posts: 1,290 Threads: 67 Likes Received: 711 in 472 posts Likes Given: 1,216 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 23 28-Jan-2018, 11:08 PM (This post was last modified: 31-Jan-2018, 02:30 PM by sirdude.) "Damn the torpedoes!!! Full speed ahead!!!" Posts: 2,286 Threads: 38 Likes Received: 1,527 in 995 posts Likes Given: 1,881 Joined: Apr 2016 Reputation: 72 Very tidy and very light! My Rooster is nearly 100g heavier without a battery. I hope your R-XSR works better than mine does! Posts: 1,290 Threads: 67 Likes Received: 711 in 472 posts Likes Given: 1,216 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 23 (29-Jan-2018, 08:49 AM)unseen Wrote: Very tidy and very light! My Rooster is nearly 100g heavier without a battery. I hope your R-XSR works better than mine does! Yeah, I've been following your thread. Seems lost of folks are having problem with them. I'll post back after I get it bound and have a chance to use it. "Damn the torpedoes!!! Full speed ahead!!!" Posts: 5,315 Threads: 672 Likes Received: 3,155 in 1,743 posts Likes Given: 2,030 Joined: Jan 2016 Reputation: 139 Awesome build 290g, a bit heavier than I expected, probably because of the 2206 motors and the new version Floss weight has gone up a fair bit from the last version. A lot of people have chosen 1806 motor with two-blade props for this type of ultra light racers, seems to work alright Posts: 1,290 Threads: 67 Likes Received: 711 in 472 posts Likes Given: 1,216 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 23 "Damn the torpedoes!!! Full speed ahead!!!" Posts: 7 Threads: 2 Likes Received: 4 in 3 posts Likes Given: 1 Joined: Dec 2017 Reputation: 1 What about a compromise using a 2204? Posts: 1,290 Threads: 67 Likes Received: 711 in 472 posts Likes Given: 1,216 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 23 (05-Feb-2018, 04:55 PM)Propflux01 Wrote: What about a compromise using a 2204? Its all about balance....The smaller motors make it lighter so the thrust you might lose because of the smaller motors and bi-blade props is offset by the machines lighter weight. It makes it more agile and depending on what you're running, it can actually be faster. This is a racing frame, but I fly acro and proximity (mainly proximity) so I opted for the more powerful motors with tri-blade props. However, I may go ahead and get some smaller higher kv motors and try them just to see what the difference is. Your suggestion of 2204's may be a good one, but I am not sure there would be a significant savings in weight. Like I said, I can't fly up to the capabilities of either setup anyway. "Damn the torpedoes!!! Full speed ahead!!!" • |