Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The KT-Bug 125mm!
#1
Big Grin 
So...

[Image: B9jL8Url.jpg]


After breaking a second Firer 110 frame, (this time it actually deserved to break) decided to try something new. There are more than a few 100 to 130 millimeter frames available, but wanted a little more space for the stack and parts.  Found this one and built based on it. It is basically a scaled down version of my (now beloved) Charpu 210mm frame

There are a few differences, but the layout is almost the same and one that I am familiar with.  Something I realized is the extra 15mm footprint will allow for 2.5” props! For now I am sticking with 2”, but eventually I might try the larger ones.

I have only flown it a few times in failing light to test that it works. It flies.

Frame: Usmile H125
FC: HGLRC F4 (Part of the F428 stack)
ESC: HGLRC 28A (Part of the F428 stack)
Motors: Dragonfly MC1105, 7500kv
Camera: RunCam Swift Micro 2
VTX: HGLRC TX20 (Part of the F428 stack)
RX: FrySky XM+
Pretty much the same craft as the KT-110, but with the larger frame and soon an R-XSR RX.
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
[-] The following 5 users Like kaitylynn's post:
  • TMac, E.L.K., unseen, sloscotty, Tom BD Bad
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
#2
The RX antennas positioning really bugs me LOL Big Grin
Don't be a LOS'er, be an FPV'er :)  My Gear - Facebook - Instagram - Twitter
[-] The following 2 users Like Oscar's post:
  • Krohsis, unseen
Reply
#3
(03-Jan-2018, 04:02 PM)Oscar Wrote: The RX antennas positioning really bugs me LOL Big Grin

Me too!

With both of them straight up, the amount of received signal when the quad is banking in a tight turn is close to zero.
Reply
#4
Lol...they are just there for now. Still building it up. Broke the camera lens (please do not ask) and it has been essentially grounded while awaiting the replacement.

Just installed the new lens and will try it out this evening! Cannot wait Smile
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
[-] The following 1 user Likes kaitylynn's post:
  • unseen
Reply
#5
[Image: weHzj2ql.jpg]

It took flight today and is awesome!  It handles similar to my 5" with ZERO tuning.  I will get some fight video posted soon.  I put about 10 packs through it with only a couple of minor hiccups...loose RX wire caused a couple of RXLOSS spills.  Nothing broken and easy enough to fix.
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
[-] The following 2 users Like kaitylynn's post:
  • unseen, Tom BD Bad
Reply
#6
Its not the position of the antennas that bugs me, its that the pink and red CLASH! Wink
Windless fields and smokeless builds
[-] The following 2 users Like Tom BD Bad's post:
  • Krohsis, kaitylynn
Reply
#7
I just received the antenna guide, so the coffee stirring sticks so graciously donated by by lovely daughter will be no more. I though I had ordered pink, but it would seem they chose grey...

Any suggestions on 2.5" props? It would be fun to see what it can do with the larger propellers.
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
Reply
#8
Pretty close to the final draft...

[Image: rJhCSBtl.jpg]

SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
Reply
#9
I'm curious......why are your RX antennas as long as they are?  On mine where I have them placed vertically and not horizontally, I try to keep them just barely longer then the next higher thing on the quad (usually the battery).  It seems that they are less prone to damage during crashes...and I crash a lot.  Sad  Oh, and I wanna know how you busted the camera lens (I had to ask) Big Grin
"Damn the torpedoes!!!  Full speed ahead!!!"
Reply
#10
That RX is one of the first RX bought by me and the original antenna wore out. The replacement antennas that I ordered ended up about 2" longer than the originals! I have a new XM+ RX for KT-210+ and the antenna are markedly shorter overall, but also the receiving (the stripped area) area is shorter. I think the longer wave catching part on the replacement antenna works better. I have a much stronger RSSI value on the longer antenna at 200 meters where the original antenna would read 70, the replacements read 85.

Seriously? I asked that you not ask...but cause you did...

When I had it out on my table, the filter glass on the back of the lens popped off and hit the ground...and broke! So the lens still worked, sort of. I tried to fly and found our fence while flying blind and scratched the outer lens. It also would not focus. Still not sure how the back glass came loose. Big Grin
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
[-] The following 1 user Likes kaitylynn's post:
  • sirdude
Reply
#11
(07-Jan-2018, 04:53 PM)kaitylynn Wrote: That RX is one of the first RX bought by me and the original antenna wore out.  The replacement antennas that I ordered ended up about 2" longer than the originals!  I have a new XM+ RX for KT-210+ and the antenna are markedly shorter overall, but also the receiving (the stripped area) area is shorter.  I think the longer wave catching part on the replacement antenna works better.  I have a much stronger RSSI value on the longer antenna at 200 meters where the original antenna would read 70, the replacements read 85.

Seriously?  I asked that you not ask...but cause you did...

When I had it out on my table, the filter glass on the back of the lens popped off and hit the ground...and broke!  So the lens still worked, sort of.  I tried to fly and found our fence while flying blind and scratched the outer lens.  It also would not focus.  Still not sure how the back glass came loose.  Big Grin

Understood. My RSSI's are never that good, but I fly through and around thick vegetation a lot and if mine were that long, I would have ripped them off in short order.

Sorry...I told you I couldn't help myself, that I HAD to ask.  I have done similar things myself as I am sure many folks on this board have.  The lesson here.......never say "don't ask", because there is always someone like me that will.  Big Grin
"Damn the torpedoes!!!  Full speed ahead!!!"
[-] The following 1 user Likes sirdude's post:
  • kaitylynn
Reply
#12
The 5VDC pad on the HGLRC F4 FC for the RX tore away and separated after a crash. There is another 5V pad on the board and I soldered the lead there. It powers the RX when on the ground. The motors spin up and at idle, everything seems to be fine. The issue comes when applying any throttle. The RX resets and again fails to launch. A few seconds and it is ready to fail again :/ Frustrating, but not the end of the world. KT-125 seems very sad sitting on the table with a broken wing.

It would appear that the second source of 5V is taken off of on of the ESC legs or some other motor related circuit. Ordered a new FC that should be here on Monday. For now, I am limited to KT-210.
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
Reply
#13
Maybe try de-soldering GND from the busted 5v pad point, and use the GND of the new 5v pad?
Windless fields and smokeless builds
[-] The following 1 user Likes Tom BD Bad's post:
  • kaitylynn
Reply
#14
(28-Jan-2018, 08:50 AM)Tom BD Bad Wrote: Maybe try de-soldering GND from the busted 5v pad point, and use the GND of the new 5v pad?

UUUUUUhm....could it be that easy?  I feel like that should have been obvious   Dodgy   And this is why I talk things through!
SoCal Kaity :D
OMG, no one told me it would be this much fun!  Addicted :)
[-] The following 1 user Likes kaitylynn's post:
  • Tom BD Bad
Reply
#15
It may be that the new pad is just be noisier, but if you think of GND as the 'ground' acting as the 'common' frame of reference for the signal... If you are using un-paired + and - the signal has to pass through other components on the board to complete its circuit, which means it has more places to pick up interference.
Windless fields and smokeless builds
[-] The following 1 user Likes Tom BD Bad's post:
  • kaitylynn
Reply



Login to remove this ad | Register Here