Hello guest, if you read this it means you are not registered. Click here to register in a few simple steps, you will enjoy all features of our Forum.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Q: Nuke v AcroWhoop for 7mm and 8.5mm motors
#1
I want to 3D Print a frame for 7mm or 8.5mm motors - similar to the one Oscar designed.

http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1677016
or
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1700311

Is there a reason to use the AcroWhoop vs the Nuke (forgetting the integrated RX on the acroWhoop, i have the FuriousFPV micro receiver in hand so the nuke can have a SBUS rx in seconds).  Which is the right FC for a brushed 7mm or 8.5mm build?

I cant really discern the difference between the two, outside of the integrated RX.

Thanks
Matt
Reply
Login to remove this ad | Register Here
#2
The main difference between Acrowhoop and Nuke is the dimension and integrated RX, hardware wise they are nearly identical:
https://oscarliang.com/tiny-whoop-fc-comparison/

I would probably go for the Nuke because on the Acrowhoop, there are motor connectors and not soldering pads, making motor installation a bit harder for 8.5mm motors (as they normally come without connectors). Being smaller makes it more flexible when it comes to mounting in the frames (and easier frame design if you are doing it from scratch)
Don't be a LOS'er, be an FPV'er :)  My Gear - Facebook - Instagram - Twitter
Reply
#3
(07-Jan-2017, 06:13 AM)Oscar Wrote: The main difference between Acrowhoop and Nuke is the dimension and integrated RX, hardware wise they are nearly identical:
https://oscarliang.com/tiny-whoop-fc-comparison/

I would probably go for the Nuke because on the Acrowhoop, there are motor connectors and not soldering pads, making motor installation a bit harder for 8.5mm motors (as they normally come without connectors). Being smaller makes it more flexible when it comes to mounting in the frames (and easier frame design if you are doing it from scratch)

Thanks for the fast reply, Oscar. I finally got the Nuke installed. I ended up using a CF frame that I had won during a contest. Now, I just need to set the PIDs. The Nuke comes with PIDs similar to the F303 or Kombini for a regular 5" Brushed quad. I  have to figure out what to use for a 8.5mm Brusheless!
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Ordered the HDZERO mob6 with the eco camera and 28k motors Rob Axel 6 223 25-Mar-2024, 05:07 PM
Last Post: BadRaven
  Nice looking motors for a 3"er build skywanderer 3 166 17-Jan-2024, 11:00 PM
Last Post: Pathfinder075
  Post crash whoop motors feel gummed up FPVme 9 270 26-Dec-2023, 11:40 PM
Last Post: hugnosed_bat
Thumbs Up Discussion 1002 motors and 2015 biblades props :thumbsup: mstc 14 945 13-Dec-2023, 01:41 AM
Last Post: Pathfinder075
  4 bolt motors on mob 7 v3 frame Alfonso Gordon 12 357 24-Oct-2023, 05:32 PM
Last Post: skywanderer


Login to remove this ad | Register Here