Posts: 6,119
Threads: 172
Likes Received: 2,290 in 1,837 posts
Likes Given: 4,738
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation:
101 07-Feb-2023, 05:14 PM (This post was last modified: 07-Feb-2023, 05:19 PM by hugnosed_bat.) as snow told, from legal position lbt - from technical you get better link quality and range by fcc.
what is more save to you? better link or staying legal?
you might know my desicion :-)
its just the firmare, you can switch from lbt to fcc or opposide. just huge woek as all receivers need to be flashed either.
you can buy an lbt radio with the lbt sticker on it and flash fcc as example
Posts: 963
Threads: 72
Likes Received: 341 in 255 posts
Likes Given: 157
Joined: Dec 2021
Reputation:
19 As well as power output levels, radio transmission devices (not just RC model transmitters) sold new in the EU zone for several years now should not be capable of outputting non-LBT formats, so not a user choice to comply or not.
For example in basic principle, FrSky D8 is not LBT, D16 is. Also Spektrum DSM2 is not LBT, while DSMX is.
Legacy eqiupment sold new before that date are unaffected. This was a second stage of legislation over a year after LBT initiation across the EU.
Most multi protocol modules or transmitters with one contained have a plethora of non-LBT formats available on them.
Its actually in the international world of Model RC trading very difficult TO stay 100% squeaky clean!
• Posts: 2,551
Threads: 76
Likes Received: 1,394 in 1,045 posts
Likes Given: 815
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation:
41 Use what you want. I fly FCC in a country that demands LBT and DILLIGAF.
Try Not, Do or Do Not
- Yoda
•